Elitism and democracy in content management
I'd only thought this week about how I would frame the content delivery for the open bible project. Whether to let it work like wikipedia or select/employ differing views along the theological spectrum.
After reading this article I think working it like wikipedia would be a nightmare. You couldn't get more trolls if you opened the content up to fundamentalists and religious nutters and unlike wikipedia the content is more subjective.
The point of the project is to lay information bare, to give the textual and historical context, to give the various interpretations of it from liberal to fundamenthol, and leave you to make your own decisions as to their relevance and validity.
The likelihood is that any view that isn't mainstream will be drowned out in the sea of conservatism. And I don't think that would be good.


Nobody messes with "the goose".
It reminded me of my own vomit-based story. The classes at Bluecoat assembly were packed into the hall in rows, facing the front, with girls first and the boys after. I was close to the girls bit, so quite a way from the end of the line. I started feeling very queasy and immediately started to make my way quickly to the end of the line in order to get out to the gym toilets.
The hoffmeister rocks and
I'd read last week that the police were going to start charging on the spot 80 quid fines for pissing in the street. Fair enough, I thought. However I find myself out in town on Friday and the main market square toilets were closed at about 12.30. Whats that all about?
Yes, yes, yes


Send yourself random, scary, King James' messages from God via 
